'Superfluid' Gravity: Planets Pulling Each Other? [THEORY]

Your science textbooks on gravitational pull by planets or objects of mass is wrong. Let me explain my theory...

You've probably been taught something like this: 

Do planets pull each other depending on mass? No.

If universal gravity underlies local gravitational/space/time and is uniform from all directions, we would indeed have additional ways of trying to understand how things work. Think of gravity as a superfluid drifting out towards the universe.

For example, visualize a sphere, the interior of which is coated with an illuminating substance radiating light from every direction. Let an orange represent the Earth and position a plum proportionally distanced. Let the mutual shadows cast upon each other's facing surfaces represent the absence of gravity as when light is blocked or atleast partially blocked, as if by a filter. 

    Let this "Shadow" represent a relative vacuum of universal gravitation and the inferacting forces between Earth and Moon become adversely different. Following the orbit of the moon, a partial vacuum exists that is inversely square to their distance, because gravity is pushing their mutual non-facing surfaces harder and the partial vacuum is causing their facing surfaces to become lighter. The Moon is not lifting the tides, like your textbooks say. If it did, it would be doing "work" (?) and that would demand orbital decay, which is not the case...

Perhaps I should visually show you, and mind you I am not an artist. It seems every teacher says that before visually showing something, heh.

The partial vacuum between the facing surfaces is steady in continuing its lifting effect beneath the moving shadow of te Moon. Twice a day we are a little bit lighter and on the non-facing surfaces everything is a little bit heavier. The Moon does not pull us. That makes sorta sense, but then looking deep into it I told myself "wtf?" 

Take perhaps my first illustration, which illustrates only the gravity shadow cast by the moon and universal gravitation arriving normal everywhere pushing up the ocean bulge into the vacuum, and again not a great artist here, but bear with me;

My second illustration applies the geometry of light as an analogy and introduction to the compound way gravity might affect Earth and Moon perhaps causing a bigger bulge.

Concluding, mass does not directly affect somesort of "gravitational pull". Your textbooks may be wrong. Gravity is a superfluid, partially acts as if it were a light beam from an unknown unified source. It's not mass that is pulling objects together, because if that were so then the Moon would not move away from the Earth 4cm every year. I'll try to disprove your textbooks in future post. Perhaps breaking the law of conservation of mass (hint: The Big Bang plays a role in such topic)

Ciao.

-Usama S.

Gravity as a Push Force [THEORY]

Background tone whilst reading: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwNJ34RP_xc&list=UUjt7bEwtlk6A6f_CiY2ZOlQ

Everywhere — in elevators, planes, cars etc. gravity appears as a force that pulls or attracts, but common sense observation tells us precisely the opposite, that it is a force pushing down on our heads. We encounter push-gravity as the gravity equivalence that impedes acceleration of mass, and push-gravity gives rise to Newton's first law of motion. Einstein's equivalence is Newton's opposite reactive force. You push, accelerate uniformly, and something pushes back.

However, push hard enough, and this invisible opposite force becomes greater and begins to crush. It slows time and space and with greater compression resistance, prevents mass from reaching light speed. Now we ask, if gravity were a property of matter then what could be pushing back with an opposite force? 

Think of it; if a spacecraft accelerated toward to speed of light, the opposite reactive force would flatten astronauts between two gravity push forces. Did I mention being an astronaut is my dream job? 

Well now you know. Anyways, gravity cannot be an attraction force, but is more correctly identified as a push force. Capable scientists beginning as early as Newton's time have considered this possibility, in various versions. 

Consider push-gravity in the following two-dimensional analogy. Imagine a river current flowing against a small rock, which blocks and weakens the flow that otherwise would have pushed against a bigger rock immediately downriver. The partial "vacuum" of current between the two would increase the net push current force against the smaller rock and push it towards the bigger one. From this analogy, we might see why a perpindicular-to-the-surface gravity force might push a smaller mass toward a bigger one in accordance with Newton's inverse law. Beyond the partial vacuum of gravity that gives the illusion of "attraction", lies the limitless compression potential of gravity flowing frictionless, collisionless etc. 

What we percieve as pull-gravity is universal gravity curving as the local push of space-time curvature. While universal gravitation is everywhere uniform, it is the relative absense of universal gravity between celestial bodies that gives the illusion of attraction

More theories on gravitational force in a uniformed matter in our galactic universe coming soon... I just have to find the time to write these. Hope you enlightened yourself with this blog post. 

-Usama S